congalineofdurin
blake-the-half-demon:

furbearingbrick:

mehreenkasana:

Except you are so daft, it’s not even remotely amusing.
The USB key was essentially developed by a computer whiz to store data, information and other software in a mobile source from one computer to the other. The slasher you see up there was created to cut open solid objects like boxes, ropes, etc but to also carve and slice inanimate objects. The lighter you see up there was made for cigarettes. The first three objects have domestic, legitimate use.
The gun, in contrast, has no other domestic objectives and usage. It was specifically made to kill. That is all. Kill. You don’t use a gun to store software programs, you don’t use a gun to peel an orange, you don’t use a gun to light a cigarette up. You use a gun to kill.
Try another comparison. Stop embarrassing yourselves. 

APPLY COLD WATER TO BURNED AREA

NAH MAN IT’S A THIRD DEGREE BURN HERE THE PERSON NEEDS A SKIN GRAPH

Well, hate to say it, but this argument is worn out and falsified so many times just because everyone hops onto the bandwagon of “Guns are bad blaaarggh”. The point of this picture was this: INANIMATE OBJECTS DON’T CAUSE CRIME.Crime.If you wish to argue that it has no other domestic objective other than to kill, that is fine. But don’t you dare establish a corelationship between ‘Killing’ and ‘Protecting’. A criminal doesn’t give a flying fuck about laws, so they’ll have a gun if they want a gun to kill. You can have a gun to protect your home, family, or self. I’ve been shot by a criminal wielding a gun and don’t blame the gun. I BLAME THE FUCKING CRIMINAL.
Focus on the topic, not on your own damn crusade.

blake-the-half-demon:

furbearingbrick:

mehreenkasana:

Except you are so daft, it’s not even remotely amusing.

The USB key was essentially developed by a computer whiz to store data, information and other software in a mobile source from one computer to the other. The slasher you see up there was created to cut open solid objects like boxes, ropes, etc but to also carve and slice inanimate objects. The lighter you see up there was made for cigarettes. The first three objects have domestic, legitimate use.

The gun, in contrast, has no other domestic objectives and usage. It was specifically made to kill. That is all. Kill. You don’t use a gun to store software programs, you don’t use a gun to peel an orange, you don’t use a gun to light a cigarette up. You use a gun to kill.

Try another comparison. Stop embarrassing yourselves. 

APPLY COLD WATER TO BURNED AREA

NAH MAN IT’S A THIRD DEGREE BURN HERE THE PERSON NEEDS A SKIN GRAPH

Well, hate to say it, but this argument is worn out and falsified so many times just because everyone hops onto the bandwagon of “Guns are bad blaaarggh”. 

The point of this picture was this: INANIMATE OBJECTS DON’T CAUSE CRIME.

Crime.

If you wish to argue that it has no other domestic objective other than to kill, that is fine. But don’t you dare establish a corelationship between ‘Killing’ and ‘Protecting’. A criminal doesn’t give a flying fuck about laws, so they’ll have a gun if they want a gun to kill. You can have a gun to protect your home, family, or self. I’ve been shot by a criminal wielding a gun and don’t blame the gun. I BLAME THE FUCKING CRIMINAL.

Focus on the topic, not on your own damn crusade.

ruinedchildhood